What is Financial Risk Management and Why Study It?

green plant in clear glass vase

What is Financial Risk Management and Why Study It?

Every business, regardless of size, deals with some degree of risk. There are several variables to consider for every decision involving finance, and a certain amount of risk can never be avoided. But it can certainly be mitigated. As such, companies are increasingly looking to specialists in the field for expert evaluations to help make decisions that directly impact a business’ revenue. Read more about financial risk management and why it’s a promising career…

What is financial risk management?

Every investment comes with potential risks. In fact, there is no profit without risk. Contrary to what we are used to, risks in finance can be positive as well as negative. In short, a risk is any deviation from the expected outcome. Risk management is the necessary step of evaluating possible outcomes, analyzing potential gains and losses, and deciding on what action should be taken (or not) given the conclusions from the evaluation.

Why study it?

A 2019 report by Accenture indicated that new investment risks are emerging with unprecedented speed. The top three new challenges appointed by specialists were disruptive technology, data breaches, and operational risks. Moreover, climate change has become a factor to be considered as property, infrastructure, and land damage pose new challenges.

Sustainable economy

While some may believe financial risk pertains only to high-ranking CEOs and investors, it’s essential to understand how it affects everyone. A country’s population is entirely interconnected through its financial system, and poor financial decisions can lead to an unreliable market and a declining economy. Having a reliable financial market means a stable and sustainable economy, in which everyone will benefit from better living conditions.

Solve climate change risks

As mentioned, the reality of climate change can affect businesses and investments in many ways. Besides the physical risks of property damage, business disruption, and the need for relocation, factors like technological transition and policy changes need to be considered in a risk analysis.

Cybersecurity

Cyber risk is the number one threat to the global financial system, says U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. Financial institutions are prime targets for cyberattacks, and sector leaders have appointed cyber security to be at the top of their priorities, rising above every other potential risk. Risk managers need to develop strategies to effectively deal with the cyber threat in a world that relies on technology to keep the global economy afloat.

Cryptocurrencies

The recent boom in cryptocurrency assets can directly affect the overall financial system. A report by the Financial Stability Board has highlighted vulnerabilities in the crypto market, such as linkages with the regulated financial system, liquidity mismatch, and credit and operational risks. Blockchain intelligence companies have invested in risk management technology, but this remains a sector that will need to be followed closely as it further develops.

Geopolitics

Not many companies fully consider how geopolitics involves a variety of financial risks. Access to natural resources, proximity to countries in conflict, limits on foreign relations, corruption, and local culture are just some factors to consider in a risk analysis. Each location provides a particular financial scenario, and only by fully understanding this context can a business use it to its advantage.

Work opportunities

A specialized professional in financial risk management is necessary for every business. Many companies hire consultants or teams to anticipate exposure, quantify the risk, and plan mitigation strategies. As a risk specialist, you can work in sales, trading, marketing, banking, and many other sectors, while benefiting from the increasing demand for qualified professionals in the field.

Read more at What is Financial Risk Management and Why Study It?

Subscribe us to get more updates, and leave your comments below

The Future Of Performance Management Is Not One-Size-Fits-All

In 2013, CEB research found that 86% of organizations had recently made significant changes to their performance management system, or were planning to. In 2014, a Deloitte survey found that 58% percent of companies surveyed did not think performance management was an effective use of time, and many media outlets jumped on the opportunity to air their grievances.

Finally, the rising wave of discontent seemed to crash in 2015, as a slew of large organizations like GE, Accenture, Netflix, and Adobe all scrapped their age-old annual performance management processes in favor of more continuous feedback systems. And many others followed suit.

But, was it the right move for everyone?

Last summer, I wrote an article on this topic myself, urging business leaders to really consider the implications of following these organizations. The issue, in my opinion, is not that these organizations did something wrong. Rather, the risk is that many leaders misinterpreted these stories to mean that they should abandon performance management altogether.

One thing is clear: the future of performance management in the American workplace is still very much in question.

For more insight into this important topic, I recently sat down with a handful of thought leaders in the performance management space, including Rob Ollander-Krane, Senior Director of Organizational Performance Effectiveness at Gap, Inc., Nigel Adams, Global Chief Talent Officer at Razorfish Global, and Amy Herrbold, Senior Director of Organizational Development at Kellogg. Together, we discussed the future of performance management to understand, from their perspective, why changes to this process are long overdue.

Read more at The Future Of Performance Management Is Not One-Size-Fits-All

Write your opinions in the comment box below and subscribe us to get updates in your inbox.